The
IJARMRT
follows a meticulous double-blind peer review process that keeps both the
author and reviewers anonymous throughout the review process.
Upon
receipt, each manuscript is thoroughly assessed by the Editorial Office and if
it falls within the scope of the journal and satisfies the minimum required
standards of quality, it is then forwarded to at least two independent
reviewers for detailed evaluation. To preserve the double-blind review policy,
all identifying author information is removed from the manuscript.
The
remarks from reviewers are kept highly confidential and are communicated to
authors in an anonymous format. It is then up to the Editorial Board of the
journal, based on the suggestions of the reviewers, to accept, revise, or
reject the manuscript.
The
authors of each manuscript are informed of the final decision made by the
journal, along with the comments from the reviewers. If revisions to the paper
are required, acceptance of the manuscript is contingent upon authors properly
implementing all the necessary changes.
Double-Blind
Peer Review Policy
The
journal uses a blind peer review system. This system will maintain fairness and
impartiality, to ensure the highest quality research. The initial manuscript
will first be scrutinized by the editorial staff, it will then be determined
whether or not it is appropriate for publication in this journal, if it meets
original and quality standards it will be passed to at least two other people
to assess. The names of the authors and reviewers will remain secret, as the
reviewers will be able to state their opinion without worrying about the
author's potential reaction. The reviewer comments will also be kept secret and
will only be sent to the authors through a method that ensures the anonymity of
the reviewers.
The Executive Editor, Editorial Board members, will make a decision about the accept or rejection of each manuscript after reading the reviewer's comments. Authors will be told of the decision with details on what modifications are required if they wish for it to be accepted.
Open Access
Policy
The
journal is open access; this ensures all published articles can be freely viewed
and downloaded by the entire community, under license allowing redistribution
for non-commercial purposes, with attribution to the author and publication
source.
Plagiarism
Policy
The
journal checks all manuscripts for plagiarism. This means checking if the
authors have copied someone Work without saying where it came from. The authors
must make sure their work is their own.
If
the journal finds out that someone has plagiarized the manuscript will be
rejected. The authors may also not be allowed to send in any manuscripts for a
while.
Authorship
Policy
The
authorship of the manuscript should consist of the people that performed the
research. All authors must have contributed to the study. Should have approved
the manuscript. The authors will take the responsibility that the work is true.
Complaint Policy
The
journal wants to hear if someone has a complaint. If someone is not happy, with
something the journal has done they can tell the journal. The journal will. Try
to fix the problem. People can send an email. Use the enquiry form to complain.
Repository
Policy
Authors
can share their work in places like on their university’s website. They just
need to say where the work was originally published.
Retraction
Policy
The
journal follows the rules of the Committee on Publication Ethics. If someone
does something like cheating or making a mistake the journal can take back a
published article.
You can find
information about this here:
It
can be found at the following link:
https://publicationethics.org/node/19896
Copyright Policy
Authors
retain the copyright of their article. Journal is permitted to print and
disseminate the article. The journal will print and disseminate under a license
which permits use and dissemination of the article:
Creative Commons
Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike 4.0.
Link:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0